Monday, June 25, 2018

Is It Safe To Genetically Engineer Plants?

When one hears the term, "genetic engineering" the image of a hideously mutated plant or a mouse with glow-in-the-dark ears comes to mind. While it is true that DNA is altered (mutated) due to genetic engineering, the effects are not always visible. Although there have been many issues regarding the consequences of modifying an organism's DNA, there have also been many benefits to doing so. Genetic engineering can be done to humans, animals, bacteria, anything that has DNA or RNA but for this post, I will be focusing more on the genetic engineering done to the plants humans eat.
For farmers, genetic engineering technology has created stronger crops that can “withstand weather extremes and fluctuations” (ConnectUSfund). Farmers will be able to produce large volumes of undamaged crops no matter the severity of the weather. Genetically engineered plants are also protected from insects because they can produce their own pesticide. The good thing about this is that farmers do not have to spray toxic pesticide on their crops. Not only does genetic engineering help the farmers, it also benefits the consumer!
Most of the veggies eaten at the dinner table are Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Those shiny, plump, flawless, delicious looking tomatoes? Those juicy, sweet, yellow kernels of corn? How about those nutritious vitamin-C filled carrots? All of those listed vegetables are GMOs. In fact, the original tomatoes were a lot smaller, with more wrinkles and lumps than a GMO tomato; corn was thin, tiny, almost inedible; carrots were “originally purple or white with a thin, forked root” (Business Insider). The ConnectUSfund blog also claims that “GMO foods have been engineered to become more nutritious in terms of vitamin and mineral content.” GMOs are so beneficial that it has helped alleviate some of the nutritional problems around the globe!
All of these benefits sound wonderful but there are downsides. Scientists are human and will make mistakes when modifying the genetic makeup of a plant. Unfortunately, those mistakes have consequences such as creating mutations that are harmful for human consumption or just taste strange. The plant/vegetable could lose its flavor; when genetically modifying a plant, the new proteins that are created can cause an allergic reaction that would have never happened with the original plant.
Insects can also develop immunity to the protections that have been genetically engineered in the plant via natural selection. Another consequence would be the GMO plants cross pollinating with non GMO plants, creating an invasive species. The natural predators will not be able to eat it, thus causing an overpopulation of GMO plants in the wild.
However, the Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine says “there is little documented evidence that GM crops are potentially toxic.”, also stating that “GM crops are tightly regulated by several government bodies.” That includes the “Food and Drug Agency, the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service” (Kay). The GMO plant has to go through a long procedure of approval to even get to the shelves so the chances of contracting an illness from GMO is very slim.
Genetic engineering in plants has its pros and cons. Environmental consequences that should be considered before we ultimately change the plant’s DNA. Regardless, it is clear the GMOs help more than harm. It helps farmers protect their crops from insect predators and the weather, people around the world are now able to get nutrients they could not have gotten before and the crops taste great too (most of the time)! I encourage everyone to read about genetic engineering in plants to stay informed on the topic. We are eating those GMOs after all!



Sources

Genetic Engineering: Animals

When it comes to genetic engineering in animals we all think of doubled headed creatures or something related to that. Though when you go more into the topic and start researching about it you will find out that it is more than just mutated creatures. It is about finding cures for diseases, making a higher livestock, having a longer life for them or having them not go extinct. 
Genetic Engineering (GE) for animals began in 1980 there first animal was a rabbit. FDA had to step in so that they can insure the safety of anything related to the procedure. Ensuring that it is done with safety precautions. They have to be aware of anything that is going to be in contact with human or out in markets. Scientist used animals to develop a much bigger and stronger animal meaning having more muscle. As well for the animal’s meat to grow larger in size as said in Vision Launch or for animals to produce more milk. Having farm animals to be of more value.
Genetic engineering is well used to clone species so they would not go extinct, or to make their life time longer. As well to adapt to a different environment or temperature. Basically, what scientist are doing is experimenting to have a more advanced life for animals and humans. We can see the advantages to genetic engineering in animals though most people still find that it is not safe. 
The disadvantages to this is that people or other researcher’s might have an opinion on whether this scientific method is somewhat bizarre. There is still many defaults that may not have been seen with time. A humans body is totally different from an animals system and as much as we would like to have so many cures for any disease we never know the outcome. Sometimes messing with an animals system creates a change in genes as well we don’t know the outcome of that trying to make a species not extinct changing the genes can cause it anyways because of how a new born species has a total different gene format than the species before. 
Scientist are known for experimenting and finding new research, but sometimes mixing things can cause more trouble than ever. We never know when it can go too far to cause something tragic. Researchers can become obsessed and make something totally out of place that’s why many believe Genetic Engineering can be harmful. 
At the end some believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages because it gives more reason for hope. Genetic Engineering in animals has given more good outcomes. It has helped with farm livestock, curing diseases, and giving animal a longer period of life. Scientists will keep on doing their research to keep on figuring out more ways to have an advance life cycle. 



 Sources 

"Genetic Engineering." U.S Food and Drug Administration, 1 Dec. 2017, 
     www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/
     GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/ucm113672.htm. Accessed 28 June 2018. 

Lombardo, Crystal, editor. "Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering In Animals." 
     Vision Launch, 28 July 2016, visionlaunch.com/
     pros-and-cons-of-genetic-engineering-in-animals/#. Accessed 24 June 2018.

Perzigian, Andrew B. "Genetic Engineering and Animals." Animal Legal & 
     Historical Center, 2003, www.animallaw.info/intro/
     genetic-engineering-and-animals. Accessed 24 June 2018. 

Sunday, June 24, 2018

Human Genetic Engineering

     What is good about Human Engineering? What is bad about Human Engineering? We live in a time where so many things are possible the question is being they always the best things. Human Engineering per the google dictionary the definition is the management of industrial labor, especially with regard to relationships between people and machines; ergonomics.
    
     In the article Human Engineering, it has been stated that science plays a big role in the “genomes” quoted in the article as well as technology there are so many questions asked about this developing technique. People have their own ideas about Human engineering some believe it some don’t. The people that have agreed on the study of Human engineering or think that the research is very important solely believe in the technology due to the developing medical information. For example, studies have been done on reproduction, genetics, and hereditary diseases that have been also researched on animals. One of the biggest diseases that were recently researched was cystic fibrosis and the effects of Human Engineering and the spread of the disease throughout a person’s genetics and they are using this study to try and fight the battle of cystic fibrosis along with diabetes’s and several other autoimmune diseases as time has gone on more and more researchers have found evidence that the genetic engineering has the potential to improve a person’s life or quality of life for the ones that are suffering from these diseases. The way that all of this takes place is by researchers mutating the disease and using the research on animals and plants and so far, what they have found is that the information based on the research has allowed them to see longer life in the patients that suffer, through the animals and the plants. Now they have also done research on detecting illness and diseases during a women’s unborn fetus by doing early screenings. The jury is still out on this research some are truly in belief of this technology and some are totally against it. However, based on research and what studies say per the Human engineering article if more people were on board there is a world of information that could be learned from just fetus research and early detection of disease. 
     
     There are so many positive reasons for the technology and ways that it can help with something as simple as allergies. With every upside when it comes to science there is most definitely a downside as we know there are no guarantees when it comes to science and it can sometimes be a roll of the dice when it comes to research on an animal or plan let alone a human being. Accidents happen per reviewed journals in the article indexed in pub med in the period of 2000-2015 sometimes with this type of engineering the virus that is used to be genetically modified can become what they called an endangered species mutation virus that can’t be healed because they become resistant basically stating that it can become a stronger virus. Resulting in a serious problem or outbreak that could potentially not be healed by anything or anyone as far as medications like antibiotics. The engineering process is very tricky it seems when you start talking about resistance to medications such as antibiotics eyebrows will be raised that is why a lot of the researchers really are striving for early detection of these types of things. They look for selectable markers per the article and resistance is one of them, and another is markers that help them identify certain cells that can help them early on. 

     People have lots of questions here is where the ethics becomes involved and is ok to genetically modify things like a virus. Although yes in the future this could do each and every person on the plan some good. What if this type of information gets in the wrong hands let’s say for instance a terrorist and they make up these resistant viruses? What then these are a lot of the questions that are asked by the opposing audience. They ask could weapons be formed with the use of this technology. One of the things that were stated in the article by researchers who surveyed were this is somewhat playing god and in the wrong hands, this could be so very dangerous. No opinion is right or wrong anytime that you are dealing with something as important as human body there are always going to be risk the key is to stay educated in the knowledge of Human engineering and what effects it can have may they be good or bad.

Works Cited 
Citation: Patra S, Andrew AA. Human, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Human Genetic
Engineering. J Biomedical Sci. 2015, 4:2. doi:10.4172/2254-609X.100014 Annals of Biomedical
Engineering
January 2004, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 112–122| Cite as





Why We Should Use Genetically Engineered Viruses

     Today, genetic engineering (G.E.) doesn’t seem too farfetched. The possibilities of “designer babies” look more feasible by the day, and genetically modified (G.M.) food has been something humanity started researching as far back as 1987 (Rangel). Through these scientific breakthroughs, we can create a “more environmentally friendly” version of some plants and animals (Vaesa). With genetic engineering on the rise, this just begs the question: what can we do with G.E. viruses, and should we?

     Well to start off, G.E. viruses can be used for the beneficiary of others or the weapons of mass destruction. For example, scientists have been successful in creating a virus that “[infects] and [kills] cancer cells” that also provokes “the immune system into actions against tumors” (Knapton). Other applications have also included in creating a virus that “could reduce the urge to drink,” and help develop vaccines against diseases or help create a “more environmentally friendly lithium-ion battery” (Glowatz).

     On the other hand, one of the world’s wealthiest man, Bill Gates, has warned of the potential dangers of G.E. viruses used as “biological weapons” (MacAskill). Famous cosmetologist, Stephen Hawking, has also expressed his concerns over “the risk of infectious [outbreaks],” and “genetically modified viruses” (Glowatz). These dangers of G.E. viruses are something we should consider, especially based on previous events that have occurred. For example, a scientist in a Wisconsin lab was able to “[create] a strain of the feared H1N1 flu,” also known as the “swine flu”, that was able to “completely escape the human immune system” (Glowatz). In other words, the scientist created a G.E. virus that originates from the “swine flu,” and what makes it dangerous is that once people are infected, they are “unable to resist an outbreak” (Glowatz).

     Now, the potential of G.E. viruses can help people in a multitude of ways. However, the ability to create a weapon capable of wide-scale bio-terrorism makes this concept hard to trust. Similar to the reasons why some people do not trust G.M. foods, other individuals, such as Bill Gates and Stephen Hawking, do not trust G.E. viruses due to their potential effects on the human body. So, should we use G.E. viruses and to what extent should we use them for?

     We should heavily regulate the use of G.E. viruses in the world, because of the easily abusable methods of creating a virus to kill. However, this does not mean we should be scared of G.E. viruses and instead exploit the benefits it provides and can provide in the future. Therefore, G.E. viruses are something scientists should research and develop to integrate as potential medical options or technology enhancements while treading carefully due to the dangers of what G.E. viruses hold.

Sources

Glowatz, Elana. "Genetically Engineered Virus Dangers: Why Does Stephen Hawking Think It Will  Wipe out Humanity?" Medical Daily, 17 Nov. 2016, www.medicaldaily.com/genetically engineered-virus-dangers-why-does-stephen-hawking-think-it-will-404595. Accessed 25 June 2018.

Knapton, Sarah. "Genetically Engineered Virus 'Cures' Patients of Skin Cancer." The Telegraph, www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11631626/v.html. Accessed 24 June 2018.

MacAskill, Ewen. "Bill Gates Warns Tens of Millions Could Be Killed by Bio-terrorism." The Guardian, www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/18/bill-gates-warns-tens-of-millions-could-be-killed-by-bio-terrorism. Accessed 25 June 2018.

Rangel, Gabriel. "From Corgis to Corn: A Brief Look at the Long History of GMO Technology." Science in the News, 9 Aug. 2015, sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/from-corgis-to-corn-a-brief-look-at-the-long-history-of-gmo-technology/. Accessed 24 June 2018.

Vaesa, Janelle. "Genetically Modified Organisms: Pros and Cons of GMO Food." Decoded Science, 5 Jan. 2013, www.decodedscience.org/gmo-food-pro-and-con/23179. Accessed 24 June 2018.

Are Genetically Engineered Foods Food At All?


Genetically Engineered Foods have been around for thousands of years. Ever since the dawn of agriculture, humans have cross bred and selectively bred plants to get certain traits, such as color, size, and shape. But as technology has heavily advanced, just about any edible product is susceptible to genetic engineering, meaning, manipulation of the DNA to get certain traits. The Federal Drug Administration declared Genetically Modified (GM) foods to be healthy back in the 80’s, but GM Foods are still feared by many. GM foods are totally safe to consume, and provide benefits to the environment.

All livestock is susceptible to
diseases.
Source: Michigan State University
Contrary to popular belief, GM Foods are totally healthy to eat. By manipulating the DNA, which is the instruction for life, millions of traits can be intensified, or suppressed. For cattle: disease resistance, or even immunity, longer life spans, shorter growing periods, less food consumption, and intensified flavors may all be achieved. This year, scientists were able to “genetically engineered pigs to be immune to one of the world’s most costly animal diseases” (Devlin). Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) invades pigs all around the globe, killing them prematurely, or inhibits them from reproducing. This puts the meat industry at a loss, both economically and product-wise. Anti – GM Food advocates believe that altering an animal´s genetic makeup will have a negative effect on them, but contrary to their popular belief, “the animals showed no signs that the change in their DNA had any other impact on their health, fertility or wellbeing” (Devlin). Genetic Engineering was developed not with a bad intention in mind. Genetic Engineering was developed to improve the products as many ways as possible. The deletion or insertion of DNA sequences simply inhibits or increases the expression of proteins, and thus traits.

With GM Foods, the environment is benefitted as a byproduct. GM Foods, both animals and plants, are intended to be less costly to maintain, both money, care, and time wise. The byproduct of making products of better quality is that “genetically modified crops and animals will also be more environmentally friendly because they conserve water, soil, and energy” (Vaesa). GM Foods require less space, water, food and chemicals to be maintained. Therefore, the environment gives less space, water, and food, and is not filled with non-organic chemicals. It is a triple really, the consumer gets a product of high quality with awesome flavors, the animals/plants are less susceptible to diseases and require les to survive, and the environment retains some of its resources for a better use. How could one be against GM Foods?

The argument against GM Foods is a strong and valid one, with very adequate points. However, a considerable number everyone’s favorite foods are probably Genetically Modified, because the technology has been heavily developed and proved to be beneficiary. The strongest points as to why should Genetically Foods be limited is the ethical side of the issue. Should humans be allowed to tamper with nature’s work? GM Foods prove great benefits, they even help developing countries thrive, since they include resistance to common viruses/bacteria and provide a vast quantity of nutrients. On the other side of the spectrum, GM Foods really should not be advocated, because Nature is being interfered with. Humans are quite literally editing Nature’s work to suit their needs and desires, and humans are simply nobody to play God. Just like everything in this world, GM Foods are not perfect. GM Foods, and biotechnology, should be used with good thoughts in mind, because if not, the world as we know it today may change completely, and not in a good way.

Sources
Devlin, Hannah. "Scientists Genetically Engineer Pigs Immune to Costly Disease." The Guardian, 20 June 2018, www.theguardian.com/science/2018/jun/20/scientists-genetically-engineer-pigs-immune-to-costly-disease. Accessed 22 June 2018.
Vaesa, Janelle. "Genetically Engineered Organisms: Pros and Cons of GMO Food." Decoded, 5 Jan. 2013, www.decodedscience.org/gmo-food-pro-and-con/23179. Accessed 24 June 2018.

This helpful video will explain genetic modification and the idea of genetic engineering.

Source Link

Is It Safe To Genetically Engineer Plants?

When one hears the term, "genetic engineering" the image of a hideously mutated plant or a mouse with glow-in-the-dark ears comes...